This approach meant the full mechanization of all operations as well as the production of meat, milk, and eggs all year round. Crop shortfalls in 1971 and 1972 forced the Soviet Union to look abroad for grain. Get time period newsletters, special offers and weekly programme release emails. Without the MTS, the market for Soviet agricultural equipment fell apart, as the kolkhozes now had neither the money nor skilled buyers to purchase new equipment. On the other hand, agriculture had become more and more state dependent. Vavilov was greatly disliked by Lysenko but after his death was recognised as a hero to Soviet agricultural research and indeed to agricultural science worldwide. [221] Henry Ford had been at the center of American technology transfer to the Soviet Union in the 1930s; he sent over factory designs, engineers, and skilled craftsmen, as well as tens of thousands of Ford tractors. The largest pig-breeding complexes were under construction in Moscow and Gor'ky provinces. The early 1930s witnessed the worst famine in Soviet history, which primarily affected Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the North Caucasus and the Lower Volga region. Pravda named Volgograd, Lipetsk, Kemerovo, Novosibirsk, and Omsk provinces, where not one hectare had been improved during the first half of the year (Pravda, 1970c). It decreed that the construction of such large complexes should take no longer than three years. Disaggregated Components of Change in the Variance of Grain Production, Soviet Union, 1955-67 to 1968-80 Other Total Change in Wheat Barley Grains Grains (%)----- (1) Mean yields 7.4 9.5 3.7 20.6 . [4] However, no such famine occurred, and these fears proved largely unfounded. In their desperation, residents butchered animals within the blockade, including strays and pets, and cases of cannibalism were recorded. Last year's disappointing 179 million-ton grain harvest is far below the. [15] The Iowan visited the Soviet Union, where he became friends with Khrushchev, and Garst sold the USSR 5,000 short tons (4,500t) of seed corn. Local scientists proved the need to cultivate two varieties of spring wheat, each with a different growing period, on all farms. As a result, famine devastated swathes of the USSR, especially Ukraine and Kazakhstan, from 1931-1933 and again in 1947. Answer (1 of 5): From my birth in 1963 to 1975 I live in 20K town in Ural, 1975 - 1980 40K town in Kursk region. During the first four years the number of such poultry complexes increased fourfold. Crop shortfalls in 1971 and 1972 forced the Soviet Union to look abroad for grain. [4][5], In 1972, there was a drought across Europe. According to the annual plan for 1970, there was to be a radical improvement of 1.668 million hectares of grassland, but only 20 percent of the plan was fulfilled. The Soviet Union tackled at breakneck speed a severe housing problem inherited from Tsarism, a problem compounded by the devastation of the war of intervention and later by WW2. Along with the economic consequences of perestroika came political repercussions. However, MarxistLeninist ideology did not allow for any substantial amount of market mechanism to coexist alongside central planning, so the private plot fraction of Soviet agriculture, which was its most productive, remained confined to a limited role. [26] In the new state and collective farms, outside directives failed to take local growing conditions into account, and peasants were often required to supply much of their produce for nominal payment. ", Il'ia E. Zelenin, "N. S. Khrushchev's Agrarian Policy and Agriculture in the USSR. Soviet figures claimed that the Soviets produced 2025% as much as the U.S. per farmer in the 1980s. Grains were mostly produced by the sovkhozes and kolkhozes, but vegetables and herbs often came from private plots. [8] Collectivization continued. He also said he had faith that our competitors would not exploit the opportunity to take up the cancelled U.S. sales. Already by 1968 to 1970, windbreaks were being planted over an area of 324,000 hectares (Moscow News, 1967). Milk production is running 2 percent higher than last year, meat production just 2 percent lower. On some suitable pretext Whymper was led through the store-shed and allowed to catch a glimpse of the bins. Even when farmers had limited grain for themselves, let alone to export, Stalin ordered requisitions. Free shipping. It was calculated that the expenditure on the construction of such a complex could be covered in two to three years. From 1965 to 1975, the amount of green grass and hay had decreased even in absolute figures (Table 8.6.). Output was hampered in many areas by the climate and poor worker productivity. [22], Drought struck the Soviet Union in 1963; the harvest of 107,500,000 short tons (97,500,000t) of grain was down from a peak of 134,700,000 short tons (122,200,000t) in 1958. The new area of land for grain was reduced steadily after 1964 by about six million hectares. In general, the development of the livestock breeding sector (as for the whole of agriculture) in the USSR between 1965 and 1975 is rather controversial. In 1977, families of kolkhoz members obtained 72% of their meat, 76% of their eggs and most of their potatoes from private holdings. Beyond a mere . This overstretched grain balance suggests great instability for a country with a capricious climate. This happened after a record year, 1966, when fodder reserves were higher than in any previous year. u.s. grain exports total and to Soviet Union in million metric tons; corn, wheat and soybeans 1978-79 estimated In the Soviet Union, with The Soviet Grain Shortage 247 policy decisions to prevent fluctuations in production from influencing internal prices. Soviet culture presented an agro-Romantic view of country life. At the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU in July 1970, Brezhnev claimed that the "most important thing for progress in the livestock sector is feed, feed, and once more feed" (this expression was meant to remind Soviet people of the famous response given by Lenin to the question "What is the main task of a young Communist": "To learn, learn, and once more learn") (Pravda, 1970b). As it was, the share of grain fed to livestock reached 47 percent of the average production (162.7 million tons) between 1965 and 1970, and in the next five years the proportion rose to 64 percent, even though average grain production also grew to 181.6 million tons. Officials seize fresh produce during the Soviet famine, or Holodomor, of 1931-1932. A model of import demand for grain in the Soviet Union low fertilizer tolerance and limited disease resistance. Under pressure to meet the production figures, farmers killed their livestock before it could breed, just to sell the meat sooner. Founded in 1893, University of California Press, Journals and Digital Publishing Division, disseminates scholarship of enduring value. With the soil conditions found in most of the virgin lands, regular setting aside as fallow is the single most effective measure for long-term stable yields. Eventually, Khrushchev purchased grain from abroad to avoid famine. Consider yourself lucky if you find job as a heating unit operator. Vast queues would form outside stores when fresh supplies came in. As for milk production, about 2,250 kolkhozes and sovkhozes of the RSFSR, or 10 percent of the total number, produced less than 1,700 kilograms per cow per year, while between 3,000 and 3,200 kilograms per cow were needed in order to provide the farmers with any profit (Sovetskaya Rossia, 1973). MOSCOW -- The Soviet Union will be forced to reduce the size of its animal herd despite buying all the grain it can under the U.S. trade embargo, Western diplomatic sources said Friday. mid-1970s, these areas would suffer from salinization and pollution of soil, while catastrophic reduction of river flow in the Aral and Azov seas became the major environmental problem for the USSR. Although the Soviet Union exported some, Figure 8.1. [8][9], The main negotiations for the deal took place on June 20, 1972, at The Madison hotel in Washington, D.C., with two Soviet teams, one led by foreign trade minister Nikolai Patolichev and the second led by Nicolai Belousov. In the southern Russian city of Novocherkassk (Rostov Region), this discontent escalated to a strike and a revolt against the authorities. Garst warned the Soviets to grow the corn in the southern part of the country and to ensure there were sufficient stocks of fertilizer, insecticides, and herbicides. For our estimation of the grain demand for feeding animals we use the following parameters: for feed grain 5 centners per standard unit for 1966 to 1968, and 7.3 centners per head for 1970 to 1976. Therefore, a deplorable 85 percent of the country's silage was inefficiently stored (Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyastva, 1971). This shows that in 1965 the changes did not eliminate the wide differences in profitability, although they did reduce them. On the other hand, the livestock sector was still characterized by very low productivity. Many scientific institutes were recruited to elaborate measures for the prevention of soil erosion. Soviet grain supply has grown to meet de-mand, but only in part. What has changed during these two decades? From the. Rural food shortages worsened into 1947, and its thought that 2 million people died during the famine. ", This page was last edited on 1 November 2022, at 20:14. Despite poor soil quality, summer fallow is limited and machinery constraints often result in fertilizer being applied to crops at too early a stage of development. The plenum also moved for the development of a specialized meat production branch in the livestock sector (the majority of communal cattle were of a dual purpose variety, in which productivity is generally very low). Here again some positive steps were taken in the course of the agricultural reform. On this basis the administration proclaimed recent ly that there would be no set-aside program for the next session. Ukrainian troops are targeting Russian-launched drones, fighter planes, and helicopters, using Soviet-era antiaircraft systems with limited radar capabilities. + $5.99 shipping. The large food imports of the Soviet Union were becoming a factor in international policy, as poor harvests meant a less aggressive foreign policy from the Kremlin. The government tended to supply them with better machinery and fertilizers, not least because Soviet ideology held them to be a higher step on the scale of socialist transition. You're an adult from the old urban class. However, the cost variations remained very great. The famine was particularly deadly in Ukraine. The latter point may merit some explanation. Figure 8.1. presents our estimations of grain demand (including food, feed, and seed requirements) for the Russian Federation between 1965 and 1975. Every large complex was to have its own facilities for the pro duction of mixed feed. Egg production was the sole branch, Table 8.7. Drought struck the Soviet Union in 1963; the harvest of 107,500,000 short tons (97,500,000 t) of grain was down from a peak of 134,700,000 short tons (122,200,000 t) in 1958. The seizing of grain during the conflict exacerbated the famine. The growth in average earnings outstripped that of productivity, and this had the greatest impact, understandably, on the labor-intensive livestock sector. Realizing that produce from the private plots was an important means of improving consumption for the urban sector, the state actually encouraged peasants to bring more to market. "Soviet Agriculture with and without Collectivization, 1928-1940. Correspondingly, the feed grain demand rose dramatically in 1969-1970 (Table 8.5.). Industry is growing. A complex feeding 108,000 head would need 25,000 hectares of agricultural land, but such acreage was not available in most regions of the country (Pravda, 1976a). The claims of inefficiency have been criticized by Neo-Marxist Economist Joseph E. [1] In the Soviet propaganda kulaks were portrayed as counterrevolutionaries and organizers of anti-Soviet protests and terrorist acts. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. The 'Great Grain Robbery' of 1972 Rachel Chenven PowersOctober 28, 2015 Original Out of the unsettling agricultural and economic events of 1972, the beginnings of a robust agricultural monitoring program were born. During and after Khrushchev's premiership, Alexei Kosygin wanted to reorganize Soviet agriculture instead of increasing investments. During the second five-year plan Stalin came up with another famous slogan in 1935: "Life has become better, life has become more cheerful." The deal was promoted to "secure the interests of the poorer nations," he said, adding that, according to Russian intelligence, the real structure of Ukraine's grain exports is vastly different. Taking costs in 1963 to 1965 as 100, the changes in the allunion average state purchase prices are shown in Table 8.4. [25][26] The term Great Grain Robbery is a pun referring to the 1963 Great Train Robbery and it is generally accepted that it was coined by Senator Henry M. The shortages resulted in bread lines, a fact at first kept from Khrushchev. She writes that the Soviet leader used the grain shortfall as an excuse for even more intense anti-Ukrainian repression. For example, in 1967 and 1968 the number of pigs decreased to only 50.8 million. ", Stephen J. Frese, "Comrade Khrushchev and Farmer Garst: East-West Encounters Foster Agricultural Exchange. The most important improvement was that, after 1965, kolkhozes introduced the principle of having a firm plan for grain deliveries for some years ahead. [4] Stalin's revolution is often regarded as one of the factors which led to the severe Soviet famine of 193233, better known in Ukraine as the Holodomor. [16] This, however, was not done, as Khrushchev sought to plant corn even in Siberia, and without the necessary chemicals. [8][9][10] The famine started in Ukraine in the winter of 1931 and despite the lack of any official reports the news spread by word of mouth rapidly. The revisions concerned grain and livestock production, although again bringing some advantage to the crop sector. Among other actions taken was the decision to lift some of the restrictions regulating the use of the peasants' private plots. ", "Examination Into Feed and Related Matters", "Russian Wheat Sales and Weaknesses in Agriculture's Management of Wheat Export Subsidy Program", "Exporters' Profits On Sales Of U.S. The lack of storage capacity qualified as an important problem requiring government resources to bring about improvements. According to the Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedia, struggle with kulaks in Ukraine was taking place more intensely than anywhere else in the Soviet Union.[2][3]. This certainly helped to worsen the conditions for obtaining the harvest in 1932. Did China defeat US in Korean War ? Between 1966 and 1970, grain demand in the Russian Federation was estimated to have grown by 24 percent, and grain production by only about 9 percent. You were an Imperial bureaucrat, teacher, clergy, small gentry, whatever. "On the whole, it looks like . Electromagnetic Radiation and Human Health, Best exercises to stop aging, keep muscles, keep brain healthy. stock in 1929. Also, interference in the day-to-day affairs of peasant life often bred resentment and worker alienation across the countryside. Western Europe produces. The herds did not receive hay at all, the main coarse feed was straw. In July 1973, the Soviet Union purchased 10million short tons (9.110^6t) of grain (mainly wheat and corn) from the United States at subsidized prices, which caused global grain prices to soar. As a result, by 1970 grain demand had approached the average figure for grain production in the republic. Case 1. This meant a demand not only for more productive pastureland but also for great reserves of hay, which was already transported from distant districts (Sovetskaya Rossia, 1970c). It is often viewed as one of the more inefficient sectors of the economy of the Soviet Union. Man Military Soldier Uniform BW Photo USSR Soviet Ukraine Vintage #644. History Hit brings you the stories that shaped the world through our award winning podcast network and an online history channel. [18] After a successful test involving MTS which served one large kolkhoz each, Khrushchev ordered a gradual transitionbut then ordered that the change take place with great speed. American negotiators did not realize that both the Soviets and the world grain market had suffered shortfalls, and thus subsidized the purchase, leading it to be dubbed the "Great Grain Robbery". It was shown that stable harvests of grain crops, and of spring wheat in particular, could be achieved in the virgin lands, but the system of deep ploughing had to be replaced by one in which the soil retained its stability, thus preventing erosion and facilitating snow retention. No one used Toilet paper in Soviet Union in 1970th. [9][19][20][21] In some British markets there was a reported 87 percent increase on the price of an 800 grams (28oz) loaf of bread. This remained out of reach. At the same time, the prices of specifically agricultural goods such as farm tractors, grain combines, and fertilizers, were deliberately left unchanged. The yearly Soviet norm for feed units per head of livestock was 30 to 35 centners (Ekonomika. Grain imports were regarded as only a temporary measure during the period in which the livestock sector was being reorganized. Agricultural failures were identified in the report as the "single most important factor" in holding the over-all Soviet economic growth rate to only 2.5 per cent in both 1962 and 1963. The cold climate, frequent droughts and mismanagement led to regular shortages of basic foodstuffs. [4] In 1936, due to a poor harvest, fears of another famine led to famously long breadlines. ", Volin, Lazar. Under the administrations of Nikita Khrushchev, Leonid Brezhnev, and Mikhail Gorbachev, many reforms (such as Khrushchev's Virgin Lands Campaign) were enacted as attempts to defray the inefficiencies of the Stalinist agricultural system. [17] The event helped lead the U.S. government to seek more information about global agricultural output via infrared satellite intelligence. Thus the collective farms were gradually being turned into state farms (Goldman, 1968). These grain imports reached a peak in 1972 and 1975, when severe droughts occurred. Current History is the oldest publication devoted exclusively to international affairs published in the United States. This meant that only 26 percent of feed grains was delivered in the most digestible form. Here we see the major indication of the failure of the agricultural policy of the USSR in 1965 to 1975. [37] Private farming may also be relatively inefficient, taking roughly 40% of all agricultural labor to produce only 26% of all output by value. Helen Rappaport joined me on the podcast for the third episode of our lockdown learning series to talk about the Russian Revolution. In November 1970, Pravda reported that industrialization had been achieved in the majority of sovkhozes. The flash point, Ryzhkov warned, could be a severe shortage of bread, the Russian staple. This was designed to lower production costs for livestock produce. To raise the profitability of the livestock sector the authorities probably relied on the implementation of a new, modern policy of the industrialization of livestock breeding through the construction of specialized, large-scale breeding complexes. In the late 1920s, Joseph Stalin collectivised farms across Russia. The revolt was put down by the military. [38], Under Supreme Soviet legislation the experimental plots/fields of agricultural research and agricultural educational institutions were inviolable, not to be seized and repurposed even by state agencies. One of the most notorious cases was during the Siege of Leningrad, which lasted 872 days and saw the Nazis blockade the city, shutting off key supply routes. Inadequate provisions were made for repair stations. According to the 1982 CIA report on the Soviet economy "The Soviet Union remains basically self-sufficient with respect to food." These are the accomplishments of an agrarian labor force that decreased from 42 percent in 1960 to 20 percent in 1980, working in a country where over 90 percent of the land is either too arid or too frigid to be farmed. Also, the 23% of arable land allotted as private plots does not include the large area allocated to the peasants as pasturage for their private livestock; combined with land used to produce grain for fodder, the pasture and the individual plots total almost 20% of all Soviet farmland. [30] The only time when private plots were completely banned was during collectivization, when famine took millions of lives.[31]. The theory behind collectivization included not only that it would be socialist instead of capitalist but also that it would replace the small-scale unmechanized and inefficient farms that were then commonplace in the Soviet Union with large-scale mechanized farms that would produce food far more efficiently. Major grain producers such as Australia, Argentina and Canada have had medi ocre harvests or are fulfilling other commitments, including those to the Soviet Union. + $20.00 shipping. But in 1957, Nikita Khrushchev achieved a purge of that troika and began proposing his reforms, of which the Virgin Lands Campaign is the most famous. [11] Especially after his visit to the United States in 1959, he was keenly aware of the need to emulate and even match American superiority and agricultural technology. These measures played a positive role in combating wind erosion in the virgin lands, which allowed the Soviet Union to further exploit them for grain production, although yields in the virgin lands remained the lowest in the country. Citing Siegelbaum's Stakhanovism in her book Everyday Stalinism, Fitzpatrick wrote: "in a district in the Voronezh Region, one rural soviet chairman imposed fines on kolkhoz members totaling 60,000 rubles in 1935 and 1936: "He imposed the fines on any pretext and at his own discretion - for not showing up for work, for not attending literacy classes, for 'impolite language', for not having dogs tied up Kolkhoznik M. A. Gorshkov was fined 25 rubles for the fact that 'in his hut the floors were not washed'". And with perestroika, the Soviet Union underwent a rapid political and economic restructuring that aimed to transform much of society. In an effort to meet the growing standards of food consumption among the Soviet people, the USSR launched a shift to a livestock economy through modernization and industrialization. This necessitated a large and growing annual subsidy, as was seen, in particular, on meat. [19], In the 1940s Stalin put Trofim Lysenko in charge of agricultural research, with his crackpot ideas that flouted modern genetics science. In 1941, Nazi Germany turned on its former ally, the Soviet Union. The probability of a drought that would cover all three major grain-producing regions in the countrythe Ukraine, the Northern Caucasus and northern Kazakhstanwas low. As a result, by 1969 the average profitability of livestock production on kolkhozes and sovkhozes had fallen to a negligible amount. MOSCOW -- The Soviet Union is facing even greater food shortages, and the result might be explosive social unrest, Premier Nikolai I. Ryzhkov warned in a hard-hitting report published on Sunday on . Other recessions (in 1969, 1972, and 1975) were associated with an acute fodder shortage caused by unfavorable weather conditions. Besides poor development in terms of fodder varieties, there were some specific reasons for the excessive waste of feed grain in the USSR. Although Siberia was well known for its abundance of grassland, an increase in the fodder crop area and the transportation by truck of huge amounts of green feed were planned for supplying the new livestock complexes (Pravda, 1970f). [11] In early July 1972, the U.S. government negotiated an arrangement that allowed the Soviets to buy up to $750 million of American grain on credit, over a three-year timespan. Loosely translated as restructuring or reconstruction, perestroika witnessed sweeping economic and political changes that hoped to increase economic growth and political freedoms in the Soviet Union. [5][6][7] A plausible alternative explanation, supported by some historians, is that the famine occurred at least in part due to poor weather conditions and low harvests. Ultimately, corn didnt grow well in colder regions, and farmers unfamiliar with cultivating wheat struggled to produce bountiful harvests. To access this article, please, Access everything in the JPASS collection, Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep, Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep. A Campaign to Conserve Bread The situation in late summer. "We had to sow these lands in northern Kazakhstan and Western Siberia with perennial grass. These lands should be used as hayfields and pasture." In the spring of 1966, many farms "were urged to sow fallow areas and eroded plateau" (Pravda, 1966). After Stalin died and a troika belatedly emerged, Georgy Malenkov proposed agricultural reforms. Bare shelves in grocery stores were once again a familiar sight. May 28, 1928. Another problem is these criticisms tend to discuss only a small number of consumer products and do not take into account the fact that the kolkhozy and sovkhozy produced mainly grain, cotton, flax, forage, seed, and other non-consumer goods with a relatively low value per unit area. In 1990, Muscovites queued for bread the first breadlines seen in the capital for several years. The famine also saw the instigation of food rationing in the USSR as the purchasing of certain goods, including bread, sugar and butter, was restricted to certain quantities. Raw sugar, traditionally from Cuba, accounted for one-quarter of the total value of agricultural imports in 1975. Suddenly, many commodities, such as paper, petrol and tobacco, were in short supply. Their capacity was planned to be 108,000 head a year. When poor sugar beet crops coincided with low Cuban cane crops, Moscow also purchased substantial quantities of raw sugar from other countries, such as Brazil, Australia, and the Philippines. Canadian farmers left between 20 and 40 percent of their spring grain lands fallow each year, and Soviet soil specialists also recommended a share of up to one-third. According to Soviet official accounts, 22 people were killed and 87 wounded. Although purchase prices had grown radically, state retail prices for all staple foodstuffs were left unchanged. Approximately the same result was obtained on many farms where systems other than deep ploughing were used. The head of the chief office for grain crop and general problems of the Ministry of Agriculture of the USSR published the article "The development of agriculture in the USSR" in the magazine Economy of Agriculture (Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyastva, 1967). One such complex would deliver 3,000 pigs to slaughterhouses a day. NEW YORK The Soviet Union has fallen seriously behind with its promised grain shipments to Cuba, forcing the government of President Fidel Castro to cut the bread ration and increase some food . The major reason was the paucity of the (green) diet of Soviet livestock. Medley. Source: calculated on the basis of Sel'skoe khozyastvo v Rossii, 2000. suggested that the Soviet Union deliberately admitted some imbalance, hoping to straighten out the situation in the near future when the modernized livestock breeding sector became more productive. In that year, 15.2 million tons were produced by Soviet feed plants. Soviet planners hoped to improve the situation by expanding the mixed-feed industry. After the speech on collectivization that Stalin gave to the Communist Academy, there were no specific instructions on how exactly it had to be implemented, except for liquidation of kulaks as a class. 1970d). exacerbated a meat shortage of already con-siderable scale. It was hoped that using the cultivation system developed in Shortandy would ensure a rapid increase in yields (of approximately 50 percent) in the virgin lands. Although the direct reasons for these decreases were different they were all associated in some way with a new policy to create large industrialized and specialized livestock complexes. "The Soviet Union, the United States, and Industrial Agriculture", Hunter, Holland. Sovetskaya Rossia reported that kolkhozes and sovkhozes had been allowed to increase the consumption of feed grain by 35 percent (1970a). In the mid-1960s, the principal question for the further development of Soviet agriculture was still the distorted prices for agricultural products that resulted in most crops and animal products being sold at very low rates of profitability. The bulk of this trade consisted in frozen meatmostly beef, mutton, and poultry. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia started its new existence as a multiparty democracy. The continuing large discrepancy between the profits to be obtained from selling grain to the state and those gained from feeding it to livestock suggested that farms would persist in choosing the former course unless ordered to do otherwise. Between 1965 and 1967, the average consumption of concentrated feed was 5.5 to 5.7 centners per head (standard livestock unit), which then jumped to 8.0 centners per head. According to the once popular saying: "If Russia has a good harvest, its foreign policy will be bold and aggressive" (Christian Science Monitor, 1970). [27], Soviet Minister of Foreign Trade Nikolai Patolichev, 1973 United StatesSoviet Union wheat deal, Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services, "Geography Droughts and Food Problems in Russia (19002000)", "The Great Grain Robbery: Lessons Learned from Earth Imaging's Early History", "What Is The Central Black Earth Region Famous For?
Lanus Vs Ind Del Valle Prediction, Official Hige Dandism, Underground Market Tbilisi, Why Is Art Important For Child Development, Importance Of Physical Education During Pandemic, Bloomingdale Urgent Care, Does Harvard Have A Swim Team, Kendo Grid Resize Column Programmatically,